Wednesday, February 17, 2016

RCL#2: Minority representation in TV


In the film and TV industry where is the diversity?  Do networks have the obligation to cast 
women and minorities in major role?  That is the question this blog post will be examining. 

Many people are completely blind to this issue, not because they do not care, just simply due to the fact they never though about it.  There are some things in life that you just accept and do not question for me the constitution of movie and TV show cast never sparked my attention, at least not there lack of minority representation.  What did spark my attention was who is playing that super hero or to be shallow, dang that female actor is hot.  It was never where is the black james bond or the Mexican whatever. 

Now that this problem has been brought up during award season, through many news outlets, I do see the constitution of a cast differently.  I now pay attention to, purely out of curiosity, how little minority and females are represented in major roles.   To me it has not affected the quality of the films, but who know maybe diversity would add quality to productions.

In an article published by NPR this problem is discussed not just from a layman observation, but also with stats that illuminate the disparity in the TV and movie industry between white males and everyone else.  

“If you want an accurate picture of ethnic and gender diversity in the United States, don't look to Hollywood (Ralph Bunche).” This statement is of the conclusion of Ralph Bunche from UCLA, who conducted a study of minority representation in Hollywood.  Some of the most telling statistics that came out of the study where about lead roles and directors.  Lead actors are 83% white, writers 88% white and Show creators 94% white.  There are many other stats that compare ratio between minority groups but these three are the most telling the problem.  The US population is about 50% white but the film industry in almost 90% white. 

Let extricate gender from the problem and solely talk about ethnicity or culture views, which is what these statistics are doing.  It is shocking.  Even though I will admit I never was aware of this disparity before doing research for this blog.  It is almost a knock on my observation abilities, since I was unable to notice this. 

My favorite genres of movies are super hero movies and when I think about who plays each lead I cannot think of one non white lead.  Superman (Henry Cavill) white, Batman (Ben Affleck) White, Ironman (Robert Downey Jr.) white.... and many more.  The argument can be made these actors have always been white, so it would be weird to have a black superman.  This is one of the greatest obstacle in Hollywood their deep rooted tradition of this is how we do things.

Recently though, especially on TV shows, diversity has been creeping in, mostly for comedic effect unfortunately.  On shows like modern family the Gay couple, Cam and Mitchel are used to add a layer of comedy that can only come from gays.  While Gloria, a Columbia female is used for the same purpose, to add diversity to the potential jokes that can be played off of stereotypes.

While diversity is starting to creep into popular TV shows like modern family, Blackish and others.  The diversity is not true in my opinion; it is simply being incorporated to be made fun of, to make the shows more entertaining at the expense of people diverse culture.  There is nothing wrong with making fun of people background, it what drives comedy shows.  This unfortunately is one of the only outlets for group of non white actors, Kevin Hart (Comedy), Ice Cube (Comedy)...etc.  Of course there are exceptions to the rule like Morgan Freeman but they are few and far between.

Studies have also shown that diversitymake movie and TV shows more money so I expect Hollywood to catch on soon enough to this.  It is a long hard process though since Hollywood and the entertainment industry has such a deep-rooted history in the exclusion of all but white men.  IT will take some time but it is taking positive step forward. 

Two possible deliberation questions are:
            1. How is TV affect by the lack of diversity?
            2. Why are minority actors missing from major roles?

Article



Wednesday, February 10, 2016

RCL#1:Social Media Comments Sections

TRUMPS INSTAGRAM POST


For anyone who may be living under a rock, and is unaware that recently the New Hampshire the presidential primary’s were held.  The results...  Trump and Sanders winning by a land slide.  Within hours of the results being tallied, and Trump and Sanders being declared the winners, social media and in particular the comments section were blowing up.  I will discus some of the comments on a simple picture Trump posted on Instagram saying thank you to those who voted for him, in the caption. 

Scatter throughout the thousands of user comments on Trumps post are some of the different ways people approach commenting on a post. People will be motivated or compelled to comment on something for many different reason I will use some example to illustrate the main reason.

1. Support- Many people will be compelled to comment on something they support by acting as cheerleaders praising the person or idea being depicted.  Cheering has no negative part to it is a simple statement of support.
            -EX: farder54-"@c_magic311 Big Don I thank you so very much for winning yesterday..."


2.Opposition- Have you ever just seen or heard something that compelled you do something about it.  To some people the mere sight on Donald Trump compels them to voice their opposition to him and his ideas, albeit not always in a smart manner.  A lot of the times opposition is displayed by not just directing opposition at the person or idea but to everyone who may support that idea, making broad generalization.  A lot of the times the user that post these type of comments in real life would never have the courage to say what they type.
            -EX:obnoxious.jay "Kill yourself"

3. Commenter v. Commenter- These type of comments are not fueled by what the post is actually about... they are fueled by what commenter have already said.  The same sentiments can be invoked from comments as the original post, sentiment of support and opposition.  Usually opposition is what drives the war of words that is the comments section, often inappropriate and demining language is used.
            -EX: Sawyer2636 @fueled_by_ryden “It’s funny how trump haters are mainly sexually confused teens illegal aliens,      foreigners, and liberal with severe mental issues.  None can vote and all are irrelevant”
            ‘’
            ‘’
            ‘’
            tylersaurus @sawyer2636 “it’s funny how Trump supporter make sweeping generalization and assume that their      perception of reality is the absolute truth.”

These different ways of commenting on a post albeit on Instagram, Facebook or some sort of news article are usefully vary demining and aggressive.  The reason behind people’s poor Internet behavior is because there is nothing personal at stake.  You do not have to look you opponent in the eye and say it; you can hide behind a shield that is the Internet.  You do not face the consequence of voicing these brazen and base comments online as you would in a personnel setting, as say our CAS 138T classroom.  People are free to be polarized and not worry about offending anyone because they are detached. 

For many the comment sections are simply a necessary evil that goes along with most media post that can be viewed commodiously, but to some they consume and can actually hurt people.  When typing something online you should think to yourself, would I want my mother to read this... ? The old saying the type of person you are is determined by how you act when nobody you know is watching.  If that saying rings true for acts on the Internet then there are a lot of immoral characters on the Internet.
                                    




Wednesday, February 3, 2016

CI#3: Presidental Candidates


A hotly debated topic for the United States for the past few years has been immigration.  What effects does it have on United States society and how to reform it?  It seems that every presidential candidate has a certain idea on how to go about immigration reform.  No ones proposed ideas have gained as much attention negative and positive as Donald Trumps reform idea.

It seems for the past four or five months when you turn on the news you are almost ensured a new soundbite from Donald Trump of him saying something blunt and controversial.  Hear are few of his quotes on immigration.

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems to us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."-Trump Presidential Campaign announcement

 

-       "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on." — Campaign Press Realsese

 

-       "Build a wall with a big beautiful door for legal immigration." —GOP Debate, August 2015

 

-       "Our leaders are stupid, our politicians are stupid, and the Mexican government is much sharper, much more cunning. [So] they send the bad ones over because they don’t want to pay for them, they don’t want to take care of them.” —GOP debate, August 2015

 

Of course when all you hear are these soundbites, Donald trump sounds like an ignorant bigot, and it is easy to become polarized against or for him.  As with anything you have look into the whole story though.  You cannot just read the cover of a book and decide if you like it.  In political campaigns candidates are just trying to say or do something to draw public interest.  What you see on the news is never any actual information about a candidate and his policy.  It is always a shell of his/her ideas that the news uses to try to polarize people.  When people come on as guest for news programs all the anchor wants to do is ask question to try and get a controversial or polarized answer out of them.  This is the same strategy used by candidates.... Donald trump is just the best at it.

The problem with immigration is that it hurts the people who are the worst off in the United States; low-income minorities, who end up competing with immigrant for jobs in the labor and service markets.  Why would an employer pay an America citizen more to do the same job illegal immigrates will do at a much lower price.  They will not.  Immigration in the US provides an over supply of labor in the US market. 

Trump wants to completely shut down illegal immigration by increasing boarder security.  While also ending many of the legal benefit these illegal have such as protection in sanctuary cities and end birth right citizenship.

The term “Sanctuary City” applies to cities that do not allow municipal funds or resources to be used to enforce federal immigration laws. These restriction of resource usually do not allow local police to investigate  the immigration status of suspected people, or federal Immigration and customs enforcement (ICE).  These cities are effectively legally breaking the law.  Which is a place were illegals can come to take advantage of the birth right citizenship law.

While in a sanctuary city illegals can have children which are then due the Birth rich citizenship law legal US citizens.... This is a major problem with the system.  The US is a favorable place for illegal immigrant to venture to because of its lenient and immigration policies. 

While Donald Trumps Ideas on immigration may not be the best or the smartest course of action to pursue; some form of action is definitely necessary in the US to reform immigration.  It is a good time to do your own research and form your own opinion.